Services
Four flagship engagements. Specific, auditable outputs.
Each flagship addresses a different starting point: the Model Governability Assessment when you need to know whether your control set holds across every framework at once, the audit when you need a first read on your enforcement gaps, the sprint when pilots have stalled short of production, and override architecture when the board or the regulator has asked who can halt the system. Three specialised variants and an SME entry point complete the set. Engagements run from two weeks to an annual programme.
Every AI governance programme has three layers: policy, process, and enforcement. Most organisations stop after the second. The gap between process and enforcement is where incident risk lives.
Flagship engagements
Start here if you need to know whether your control set holds, across every framework, at once
Model Governability Assessment
Aivance's flagship annual assessment. Tests your control set against MAS AIRG, MGF v1.5, PDPA, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act simultaneously, across five dimensions: framework reconciliation, enforcement reliability, decision lineage, authority loop closure, and evidence readiness. Produces a governability rating you track year over year.
Start here if you need a first read on your enforcement gaps
AI Risk & Compliance Audit
Diagnoses your enforcement gaps before a regulator, your board, or an investor forces the question. Structured assessment across IMDA Framework, MAS proposed AIRG Guidelines, PDPA, ISO 42001, and EU AI Act, with explicit distinction between controls that exist on paper and controls that are technically enforced.
Start here if your pilots have stalled short of production
Pilot-to-Production Governance Sprint
Most AI pilots stall before they scale. Not because the technology failed, but because governance, integration, and oversight were never built in. This fixed-scope sprint diagnoses exactly why your pilots are not moving to production and designs the governance scaffolding to get them there.
Start here if the board or the regulator has asked who can halt the system
Override Architecture Advisory
Designs who holds the kill switch and what happens when they pull it. Covers the Suspended Handoff State (the mechanism that halts an autonomous system at a critical risk threshold and requires explicit human ratification before execution clears). Designs the board reporting structure that makes this oversight real.
Specialised variants
Framework Design is the natural follow-on to the audit. The two assessments address specific regulatory surfaces and run standalone or alongside the core sequence.
The natural follow-on to the audit
AI Governance Framework Design
Designs the enforcement architecture your AI programme needs. The output is not a slide deck of principles: a set of technical controls, execution boundaries, accountability structures, and governance calendars that your team can actually operate.
For deployments with autonomous agents
Agentic AI Governance Readiness
Maps your agent deployments against IMDA's four-dimension framework and identifies where human override is nominal rather than deterministic. Runs standalone or alongside the audit.
For sensitive data across SEA jurisdictions
Sovereign AI Compliance Programme
Maps your AI stack against PDPA, MAS Technology Risk Management guidelines, and ASEAN cross-border data obligations, and produces the compliance posture to operate credibly across jurisdictions.
Investment: Enterprise engagements are fixed-fee, starting from SGD 15,000. Scope and fee are agreed before any work begins, during the complimentary 30-Minute Enforcement Gap Review. No day rates.
SME entry point
For smaller organisations deploying GenAI tools who need a documented governance baseline before the tools go into regular use.
Singapore 2026 AI Initiatives
Your AI investment may already be subsidised
Singapore is investing billions to get businesses using AI. These programmes reduce the cost of getting your governance right.
Singapore's ECI funds AI tooling, cloud infrastructure, and consultancy to help organisations build AI solutions. ECI programmes focus on capability and delivery. Aivance covers the governance layer that ensures those systems are deployed responsibly, securely, and in line with emerging regulatory requirements.
Firms in the Champions of AI programme need governance structures to deploy AI responsibly at scale. Aivance designs the enforcement architecture that makes those deployments technically defensible, not just policy-compliant.
AI transformation initiatives may qualify for existing Singapore tax deductions related to innovation and capability development. Governance advisory and risk management are typically incurred in the production of income and may be deductible under IRAS rules, depending on the nature of the expense and your tax position. This can improve the overall economics of an AI investment.
How most engagements sequence: The Model Governability Assessment is the flagship, annually recurring engagement for organisations that need governability tracked across every framework over time; it runs standalone or as the natural evolution once the Audit has established where your enforcement gaps are. The AI Risk & Compliance Audit is the lighter entry point, to establish where your enforcement gaps are. The AI Governance Framework Design comes next, to design the technical controls that close them. The Override Architecture Advisory follows, to make human oversight deterministic and board-reportable. The Pilot-to-Production Governance Sprint is its own track for organisations whose entry point is a stalled pilot. The Agentic AI Governance Readiness and Sovereign AI Compliance Programme each address a distinct regulatory surface and run standalone or alongside the core sequence. For SMEs deploying GenAI tools, the SME Governance Starter is the right starting point.
If you can't evidence it, it isn't governance yet.
Start with the complimentary 30-Minute Enforcement Gap Review. We identify which of three assurance questions your organisation cannot currently answer: does your control set satisfy the frameworks that apply to you, is it technically reliable, and can you evidence it. Within 48 hours, you receive a written diagnosis mapped to your applicable frameworks.
Book Your Enforcement Gap Review