IMDA released MGF v1.5 at ATxSummit 2026. One case study shows what enforcement-layer governance actually requires. Read the analysis →

Systems integrators & specialist partners

Give the client’s risk and audit teams an assessment independent of the implementer.

Aivance can assess a configured client environment, define remediation requirements, and validate remediation evidence while the client’s internal teams or selected specialist partners perform implementation.

Who brings Aivance in: Usually a practice leader, engagement director, security lead, or client sponsor where a consequential agent implementation needs an independent control view.

Consequential agent actions

Where authority needs to be explicit.

  1. 01Implementing an agent workflow across identity, runtime, application, and evidence layers
  2. 02Configuring human approval, escalation, or exception paths
  3. 03Connecting a client authority model to deployed technical controls
  4. 04Retesting a remediated scenario against agreed evidence requirements

Illustrative implementation scenario

A defined scenario makes the control question concrete.

An implementation team configures an approval path across the agent runtime, identity provider, and client workflow. Aivance tests whether a separation-of-duties failure is denied or escalated, and whether the decision trail can be reconstructed.

What we test

Remove the ‘marking your own homework’ objection.

The client receives an independent view of the configured controls and test results, while the partner keeps ownership of implementation and remediation.

01

Is each control requirement linked to a specific authority rule and consequential action?

02

Do the configured controls hold across normal and misuse paths in the agreed scenario?

03

Does the remediation evidence show what changed, what was tested, and what was observed?

Delivery and acceptance evidence

The evidence should be usable by the people accountable for the outcome.

The relevant delivery, risk, and governance teams should be able to see the requirements, test results, remediation evidence, and remaining limitations.

Authority-to-control requirements

Configured-control inventory

Defined scenarios and observed test results

Remediation evidence and retest record

Partner engagements can be structured as a referral, subcontract, or client-direct engagement with coordinated scoping. Aivance does not take over the implementation role unless explicitly agreed.

Discuss a partner engagement.

A 30-minute initial discussion to identify the consequential action, authority rule, and configured control path worth assessing.

Discuss a Partner Engagement