Who we help
Agents that touch customers, patients, and payments need their authority tested where they run.
Aivance applies the same assessment discipline: authority rules, configured controls, defined tests, and decision evidence. The scenarios, accountable teams, and reference inputs differ by operating context.
Sectors
For organisations deploying consequential agents.
Assessment work grounded in the authority rules, controls, and evidence needs of the operating environment.
Financial services & insurance
Customer data, payment and refund authority, approval chains, and exception handling.
Explore the assessment context →02Healthcare & health technology
Sensitive information, administrative workflows, external communication, and purpose-bound access.
Explore the assessment context →03SMEs & scale-ups
Practical authority and control design for lean teams introducing agents into customer, finance, operations, or data workflows.
Explore the assessment context →Partners
For teams building and delivering agent environments.
Independent assessment can provide a defined view of configured controls while product and implementation teams retain their respective roles.
AI agent platforms & vendors
Configured control demonstrations for products selling into regulated enterprise environments.
Explore the partner model →02Systems integrators & specialist partners
Independent assessment, remediation requirements, and evidence validation alongside implementation work.
Explore the partner model →Illustrative assessment output
A finding links the action, authority, control, test result, and evidence gap.
Action
Claims agent approves a customer payment.
Authority rule
Ex-gratia payments above SGD 2,000 require named human approval.
Observed result
Three related transactions bypassed the threshold control.
Evidence gap
The retained record did not link the aggregate amount to an approval decision.
Illustrative only. Findings are specific to the configured client or lab environment and defined test scenario.